A ‘feminine’ female prime minister?!

Wanted: A feminine female prime minister?!

Somebody said people hoped that Theresa May would be different as the new prime minister. She would bring femininity into the much controversial British politics. That she would be different to Margaret Thatcher who ruled ‘more man-like in a man’s world of ruthless politics.’

I wondered why she should be different on those lines of masculinity Vs femininity. Such hopes, I said, were typical expectations aligned with gender stereotypes. I argued that Theresa May should simply lead. As a leader with democratic values of good governance. Not as a woman or a man politician but as a leader with vision and awareness of the ground realities. That a woman must show her feminine qualities in the highly competitive and deceiving world of politics and governance is a reaffirmation of gendered roles. Roles of women as care takers, givers, soft, motherly, and as symbol of peace and balance are gendered expectations. There is some masculinity and femininity in both males and females.

A colleague, when I was working in the human development sector, once commented about our division head who was a female. He said she had adopted a particular masculine-style of walking and some such behaviours as a result of being in that responsible leadership role. Interestingly, although women held most leadership positions in that organisation this colleague made a comment about this particular woman. I just thought she walked and moved around the way she did because she was almost six-foot tall and big. Most women around her looked petite. I thought that colleague preferred a stereotypical image of a feminine female.

What about all those women, generally, who don’t have ‘typical’ feminine bodies, soft and gently flowing voice, and a motherly/nurturing look on their face? I have seen men responding to ‘such’ women with stern faces, unfriendly, using formal voice, showing authority and power (unnecessarily), being dismissive, disrespectful, and less tolerant. I have seen women calling ‘such’ women manly and not charming, showing them less respect, excluding, labelling and spiteful.

What about those very few female leaders of this modern world of politics who have led or leading governance? There have been ugly comments about their personhood, their personal looks, their marital status, not having children and so on. The attitude towards a ‘feminine’ female continues to be astonishingly stereotypical. The beliefs surrounding a ‘female’ image are unashamedly so orthodox. The trap of masculinity and femininity is abysmal.

Let Prime Minister Theresa May’s governance demonstrate something good for her country so that people are happier and healthier. Not as a female prime minister but just as a strong democratic leader.

Advertisements

About Vinathe Sharma

I am an interdisciplinary researcher and practitioner. My engagment is to facilitate people's understanding of their own agency and the Actionable Space in their life. I draw from various theoretical and practitioner areas of Education, Psychology, Social Work, Environmental Studies, Literature, Sociology and History. I work with communities at the grassroots as well as in the academia.
Image | This entry was posted in Articles. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to A ‘feminine’ female prime minister?!

  1. Kavita says:

    Thank you for the blog 🙂 I guess there are several layers of inquiry here – one set is that of what is masculine or feminine and why the ‘soft’ characteristics are automatically attributed to the feminine – that also, in my definition is a stereotype. The second area is that of the constituency one represents and whose mandate he/she carries – if one is democratically elected/selected to represent an interest group – be it that of Dalits, LGBT, women or any group that articulates a shared identify and shared concerns – then there is role for that representative to uphold the interests of that group -while also looking at the ‘greater good’ where required. So, being a ‘woman’ who has to assert her place under the sun – is one part of the story – the other is as a political representative does one bring in values that are an improvement over the existing norms….

  2. Glad you liked it, Kavita. Thank you for adding pertinent points to the topic. Agree that the question of what is masculinity and femininity, although quite an aged debate, is still an ongoing one open always for critical engagement. Whilst ‘soft’ characteristics are automatically attributed to a female, boys and men are also typically expected to live up an image of ‘man-up, be tough’ which is equally hard for some. However, the other question of how an elected people’s representative demonstrates collective good is a challenging process. In the context of the topic, the public expectations are that Prime Minister Theresa May would govern differently as a female, perhaps bringing a better balance to the world’s harsh and divisive politics. My suspicion is that even such expectations are stereotypical in that women are expected to be so (such as a mother balancing everything at home) which might once again reaffirm the gendered positions of ‘men rule, women unite.’

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s